Skip to content

Systematic Review: 2. Apply criteria

Analysis - Step-by step

Screen

Apply criteria

Assess quality

Extract/Manage Data

Apply criteria

As each reviewer assesses the articles returned by the searches, they must adhere to the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were defined in the protocol.  A checklist or table will assist with this.  See example table below:

 

Author

Date

Journal

Study aim

Hypothesis

Research questions

Location

Study design

Participants

Data collection &

analysis methods

Results/findings

Relevant to topic/

research question

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can create your own table, or use a template or screening tool:

 

     Screening workbook
     Covidence

 

Your table also serves as a documentation of each reviewer's rationale in selecting or rejecting articles.  A "cross check" is performed to make sure that all reviewers have agreed on the included articles (based on their abstracts).  The full texts of the included articles are retrieved at this point.

There are a number of ways to do this:

 

  • Use the DOI or URL of the article
  • Use the find full-text feature in Endnote 
  • Search in library catalogues - TROVE

The screening process is then repeated for remaining articles, this time based on the full-text of each source.  Again, this step is usually performed independently by multiple reviewers to reduce bias.  Reviewers then compare their results until agreement is reached.  Sometimes an additional reviewer is needed at this stage if inclusion of any articles is particularly contentious.  The articles remaining are the ones which will be evaluated and analysed.